Categories

Archives

» What makes a good feed – in my eyes

Posted by TheChrisD on Wednesday the 14th of January, 2009 at 9:53:55pm UTC

As someone who reads way too many blogs to be comfortable either naming the amount of them, or letting someone look at my computer screen while I’m in the feeds tab of Windows Live Mail, the quality of the feed is paramount to whether I read and comment or not. Let’s go through some examples!

The Plain Old Boring Default Blog Software Feed

About 80% of people have it set up this way. To quote… someone: “Don’t mess with that is already perfect”. And rightly so. This sort of feed means I can read the full story (or at least the full original story when it was downloaded) from my reader, both on and offline.

The only real disadvantage is the lack of formatting, or if I’m offline, pictures – but then again every feed has that and it can’t be helped.

The Excerpt Style Feed

This particular style come in two flavours – the automatic excerpt based on size, and the author-created excerpt. The auto-generated one is very annoying, especially if the first x characters don’t get the point across. But ones with author-created excerpts can be intuitive and very helpful. The Formula 1 feed tends to use the author-created excerpt option and works quite well. Although very few places rely on the softwatre automatically making a feed item by making an excerpt, those that do fail epically.

The Ambiguous One-Line Feed

These feeds are generally the most annoying type of feeds, since it’s very hard to understand the concept of the item from the single line they provide you, usually meaning that you HAVE to click through to get a gist of the story.

Some one liners are worse than others. Ones that aren’t necessarily too bad include the A1GP feed, and the BBC News feed. But one that is just plain nasty is the Bungie.net Blog feed. Usually 3 words are all they post in the feed, making it impossible to tell what it’s going to be about just from looking at the title! (Since usually the Bungie Blog is full of shit)

So, in short (or long) – summarizing your feed is not good for your feed readers. It’s no excuse if you’re a big game company, a news site, or otherwise – you obviously have no idea how best to bring the news to those people who care.

This post seems to be categorized as: Techy Stuff, Web Stuff
Things I may have mentioned include: , , , ,

  • http://thomasgeraghty.wordpress.com/ Thomas Geraghty

    You’re opinions are spot on, the summery and one liners, or even the title only are complete balls. Also, really crap feeds post items twice, or you’re logged out of the site when you get there from your reader. Amatur web designers assume that if they post the full item they won’t get traffic because people will read from their Reader. They might be right but those traffic stats are empty, people will come if they want to commant.

All opinions or viewpoints expressed on my website are the sole opinion of myself; and do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of any entity related to myself.

To get this page for you, another 32 slave bears were sentenced to 0.471 years of unpaid labour. Well bloody done.
© 2012 TheChrisD - Ranting everyday thanks to WordPress - and possibly some duck tape, scrap metal and chewing gum; not unlike Minmatar ships.
All ranting is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License